<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scientist behind fish-tetrapod find calls out Discovery Institute&#8217;s Casey Luskin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nondiscovery.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/scientist-behind-fish-tetrapod-find-calls-out-discovery-institutes-casey-luskin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nondiscovery.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/scientist-behind-fish-tetrapod-find-calls-out-discovery-institutes-casey-luskin/</link>
	<description>Righting the wrongs of the Discovery Institute</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:18:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bort901</title>
		<link>http://nondiscovery.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/scientist-behind-fish-tetrapod-find-calls-out-discovery-institutes-casey-luskin/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>bort901</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nondiscovery.wordpress.com/?p=433#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I also find just about anything from &quot;creation on the web&quot; or &quot;answers in genesis&quot; amusing.  Sometimes we have to laugh at this type of ridiculousness.  Otherwise, I think I would go crazy with rage at these people.  

I thought the list of &quot;related articles&quot; that each point to different missing links was particularly funny.  Can&#039;t they see that the existence of even one of these missing links disproves creation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also find just about anything from &#8220;creation on the web&#8221; or &#8220;answers in genesis&#8221; amusing.  Sometimes we have to laugh at this type of ridiculousness.  Otherwise, I think I would go crazy with rage at these people.  </p>
<p>I thought the list of &#8220;related articles&#8221; that each point to different missing links was particularly funny.  Can&#8217;t they see that the existence of even one of these missing links disproves creation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLT</title>
		<link>http://nondiscovery.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/scientist-behind-fish-tetrapod-find-calls-out-discovery-institutes-casey-luskin/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>JLT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nondiscovery.wordpress.com/?p=433#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Creation on the web now cites Luskin&#039;s post on Tiktaalik as support of their dismissal of Panderichthys as a transitional fossil (&lt;a href=&quot;http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/6058&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;). For some reason I find that really amusing. I&#039;m probably a bad person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creation on the web now cites Luskin&#8217;s post on Tiktaalik as support of their dismissal of Panderichthys as a transitional fossil (<a href="http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/6058" rel="nofollow">here</a>). For some reason I find that really amusing. I&#8217;m probably a bad person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
